NBA - Written by jeff on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:53 - 17 Comments

Is Oden A Bust?

Rate It!
Tell us whether this article has "trimmed your gut," and brought some objectivity to your sports-view, or if the flab of subjectivity is still weighing you down.
Gut Meter Total Votes: 46
Gut Meter Bar Gut Meter Bar
85%

greg odenMany  journalists are starting to consider the possibility that Greg Oden, the injury-laden number one overall pick of ‘07, is a bust.  Names like Michael Olowokandi and Kwame Brown are regularly mentioned when explaining how bad Greg Oden “looks” while he’s laboring up and down the court.  To add insult to injury, Oden’s rookie season was overshadowed by the play of rookies Derrick Rose and Oj Mayo.

At a glance, his rookie statistics are less than stellar.  Oden averaged only 8.9 points, 7.0 rebounds, and 1.1 blocks.  Of the 61 games he played this season, he averaged 3.9 fouls per game and accumulated 5 or more fouls 21 times.  Not bad, considering Oden only played 21:30 minutes per game.  If he were to play 40 minute per game with the same foul rate, he would accumulate an astonishing 7.2 fouls per game.

So, is Oden a bust? Or did he actually have a better season than traditional statistics indicate? In our article about Kobe Bryant, we praised John Hollinger’s player efficiency statistic called PER.  For those that did not read our last article here is a quick recap on how PER works:

“PER strives to measure a player’s per-minute performance, while adjusting for pace. A league-average PER is always 15.00, which permits comparisons of player performance across seasons. PER takes into account positive accomplishments, such as field goals, free throws, 3-pointers, assists, rebounds, blocks and steals, and negative ones, such as missed shots, turnovers and personal fouls. The formula adds positive stats and subtracts negative ones through a statistical point value system. The rating for each player is then adjusted to a per-minute basis so that, for example, substitutes can be compared with starters in playing time debates. It is also adjusted for the team’s pace. In the end, one number sums up the players’ statistical accomplishments for that season.”

Oden Compared To His Rookie Class
Greg Oden’s rookie season PER was 18.13, ranking him second among all rookies.  Kevin Love had the best rookie PER with 18.34.  O.J. Mayo and Derrick Rose finished the season with a 14.23 and 16.05 PER, respectively.  The numbers indicate Greg Oden was more efficient than Derrick Rose and O.J. Mayo on a per minute basis.  However, Mayo and Rose averaged more than 35 minutes per game, roughly 14 more minutes than Oden played, and subsequently had more opportunities to help their teams.  Unfortunately for Oden, the most he could have played before fouling out with his rookie foul rate would be roughly 33 minutes per game.

Oden Compared To NBA Busts
Now lets compare Oden to NBA busts: Kwame Brown and Michael Olowokandi.  Kwame Brown’s PER as a rookie was 11.2 and his career high PER was 15.7.  Similarly, Olowokandi’s PER as a rookie was 11.8 and maxed out at a dismal 12.4.  Hollinger’s PER rating shows that Brown and Olowokandi never had a single season with the same efficiency that Greg Oden had as a rookie.

The Curse of Sam Bowie
Many Blazer’s fans believe that Greg Oden is another Sam Bowie.  The Blazers selected Bowie as their number one overall pick in 1984, passing up on Michael Jordan.  Let’s compare Greg Oden’s rookie year PER to the best year Sam Bowie had in the NBA:  Bowie played for 10 seasons in the NBA with a career PER average of 14.6 - Bowie’s career high in PER was 16.4.

A List of Great Post Players
Here is a list of dominant post players and their rookie season PER statistics:

Let’s not forget that Greg Oden is coming off of major knee surgery.  According to his blog, he recently started squatting again after a two year layoff. Oden may foul at an incredible rate and “look” terrible while trying figure out the NBA game, but the numbers say he is light years from being a bust. In time he will likely develop into the dominant force we all thought he could be.

Check out his rookie mix tape:



17 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Fleezy
Jun 17, 2009 15:39

If I were Nate Mc. I would hit Oden with switch every time he fouled

Quote

duder maggee
Jun 17, 2009 23:08

Everyone who knows me will admit that I’m one of the biggest, but yet most fair, Blazers fans out there. I will criticize when that criticism is warranted, and I will praise when it’s earned.
Regarding Oden, I’m not calling him a bust yet. No. Was I disappointed with his rookie season? Yes, absolutely. Was it a good season? In many ways it was. We saw some great flashes of his strength, power, and agility. At the same time, we saw how uncoordinated he is right now, his hands aren’t that great, and he looks lost on the court. He also plays defense with his arms, not feet, which leads to a lot of fouls. Some of that can be attributed to him being a rookie, of course.
I think his PER doesn’t tell the entire story. Look at his game log, and you’ll see his best games came against teams with no inside presense (ie Golden State when he put up 22 and 10; the Bucks without Bogut – 25 and 14; Wizards 18 and 14). He also had awful games against anyone that had a decenter center, such as Phoenix, Houston, LA Fakers, Orlando, etc. So, his PER is skewed. I’d love to see what it was like against, say, the top 10 teams in the league, and compare THAT to the results of other rookies. Dan, Jeff – can you guys run those numbers?? That’d be awesome.

Finally, as far as his fouling, compare him to other recent centers:
Dwight Howard: 2.8 fpg, 32.6MPG, started all 82 games, 17.27 PER
Emeka Okafor: 2.9 fpg, 35.6 mpg, started all 73 games he played, 16.4 PER
Yao Ming: 2.8 fpg, 29 mpg, started 72 games, 20.2 PER

And by the way, each of them had higher Fouls per Game in the 2nd season than in the first.. We know Oden can’t afford that, unless the fouls are more spread out over the course of the game and he manages to stay on the floor longer.

The bottom line is, Oden is not a bust yet, of course not. But I’m far from saying “he’ll definitely be a superstar”. Look, he’s had one year in the league, that’s not enough to make any kind of accurate decision about him. I pray that he becomes great, I really do. And I hope he becomes AT LEAST what Dwight Howard is today (I don’t see why he can’t – they have similar skill sets in my opinion). But for now, I’m just gonna enjoy my Blazers team at the top of the Western Conference for the next decade, whether he’s part of it or not (and I sure hope he is the centerpiece of it all).

Quote

harold
Jun 18, 2009 7:57

Great article. I mean when I watched Oden play this season the only thing he did poorly was foul on pretty much ever possession. Do you think his fouls will go down at all?

Quote

Mike
Jun 18, 2009 15:43

I think he will be the best center in the league.

Quote

Blaz06Draft
Jun 18, 2009 17:31

Greg Oden’s rebounding is what sets him apart. If his rookie year is any indication, he is a once in a generation offensive rebounder.

According to basketball-reference.com, his rookie year offensive rebounding percentage was 15.7%. This is right up there with the rookie years of Rodman (15.6%) and Moses Malone (15.5%), and above Buck Williams (13.7%) and Barkley (12.5%). These are generally considered the greatest offensive rebounders in the last 35 years.

Dwight Howard led the league in offensive rebounds this year by a far cry, and he had 13.8%. So Greg’s offensive rebounding rate was 14% better than this year’s league leader.

This manifests itself not only as an individual stat. In fact, he not only grabs more offensive rebounds when he’s in the game, the whole team grabs even more. So he doesn’t “suck up” offensive rebounds from his teammates. Rather, he “makes his teammates rebound better” (related to “makes his teammates play better”), and to an amazing degree.

From basketballvalue.com come the team offensive rebounding stats. The average team has an offensive rebounding rate of 29%. These numbers are fairly clustered, with all but the best and the worst ranging from 26% to 31%. The best (except for Portland) is Philly at 33.4%.

Portland without Oden, is 32.5%, which would be 2nd in league. But with him, we rise far above the pack. With Greg in the lineup, our offensive rebounding rate is 38.7%! If you are into statistics, with Greg in the lineup, Portland is 5 standard deviations better than the average.

For one individual player to make that much of a difference is truly amazing. It’s such an incredible margin, and indicates that he is a once in a generation offensive rebounder.

Quote

jeff
Jun 18, 2009 18:26

Great comment Blaz06Draft! His rebounding rate is truly remarkable. You should check out Kevin Love’s rebound rate as well. He is a machine.

Quote

Kwame
Jun 19, 2009 17:11

yes he is

Quote

Woah
Jun 19, 2009 18:33

You guys put it as if Oden is unlucky with fouls. Like he just happens to be getting more fouls than other guys. He is the one committing them. He is the one who can commit less of them. A guy you can compare him to is Carlos Boozer. Over the past 2 seasons (one of them injury plagued) Boozer has averaged 3.6 fouls per game, very similar to Oden. Over that span though he has managed to average playing over 33 minutes per game. He also has posted PER’s of 21.83 and 17.28 (the second coming in only 37 games). To add to this point, since Boozer has been a member of the Jazz he has averaged a PER of 20.79 (with his lowest PER since his rookie year coming last season), played no less than 31 mpg (in a season where he only played 33 games) and averaged 3.4 fouls per game. So to say that the fouls are the culprit for Oden’s lack of playing time or productivity is not really founded. Oden has averaged a slightly higher foul rate and both players have been injury proned with the bulk of the injuries being severe knee injuries, making them a decent comparison. There is some other reasoning behind his lack of playing time. Perhaps its the stellar play of Pryzbilla that has lead to Oden’s diminished minutes or maybe McMillan just doesn’t see it yet. That remains to be seen.

Quote

daniel80111
Jun 19, 2009 20:11

Oden’s lack of playing time due to fouls actually is founded. Especially when a rookie commits fouls, coaches will often sit a rookie in foul trouble to teach them a lesson to stop committing dumb fouls. Przybilla may be a good back up, but Oden’s productivity is the reason he was the starter until he injured and fouled his way out of the spot. Przybilla had a 15.46 PER. Not too impressive, just an average player in the league. Also 2.46 fouls per game. Thanks for playing.

Quote

duder maggee
Jun 19, 2009 23:14

“Oden’s productivity is the reason he was the starter until he injured and fouled his way out of the spot”

Not really true. He was the starter because he was the #1 pick and there was pressure to start him at the beginning of the year. Throughout preseason there was a LOT of chatter in Portland (trust me, I know) about Joel being better and more ready right now, but how do you NOT start a #1 pick who is supposed to be the cornerstone of your franchise for the next 10 years? Pressure…

If Oden was truly better than Pryz right now, he’d have his starting job back when he came back. But at this point, he’s not (I don’t care what PER says). If you watched as many games as I did (i’d say I watched about 70 of them this year), you’d have seen that Oden is NOT ready to be a starting center, one of the reasons being him fouling way too much.

And as far as “lack of PT DUE to fouls” being founded – not sure if that’s the right way to look at it. It’s circlular logic. He fouled because he was on the court for such limited time and couldn’t get in the rhytm and was overly aggressive. However, he was on the court for a limited time because he fouled a lot. And a LOT of his fouls were just stupid stupid fouls and not playing good defense, pushing people with his hands, etc.

Can’t wait to see what Oden does next year though! I’m predicting 14-11-2blocks, in about 30 mpg.

Quote

Lak3r Fan
Jun 20, 2009 0:11

Bynum is better than that joker. Bynum could dominate the league more than lebron, oden, kobe, wade or any of those dudes.

He’s large marge son. Oden is Bambi son. Wobbles as it were. His feet don’t move right.

This site has some funny stuff on it son. By the way teh Blazers aren’t going to win title after title.
hahah

Grandpa oden needs a cane.

Quote

Greg Oden
Jun 21, 2009 1:53

I read this site and thought it was interesting. I think yall are looking at it different than the players do…

Quote

Jay Z
Jun 21, 2009 19:27

Guy can really rebound.

Blaz06Draft: Greg Oden’s rebounding is what sets him apart.If his rookie year is any indication, he is a once in a generation offensive rebounder.According to basketball-reference.com, his rookie year offensive rebounding percentage was 15.7%.This is right up there with the rookie years of Rodman (15.6%) and Moses Malone (15.5%), and above Buck Williams (13.7%) and Barkley (12.5%).These are generally considered the greatest offensive rebounders in the last 35 years.
Dwight Howard led the league in offensive rebounds this year by a far cry, and he had 13.8%.So Greg’s offensive rebounding rate was 14% better than this year’s league leader.This manifests itself not only as an individual stat.In fact, he not only grabs more offensive rebounds when he’s in the game, the whole team grabs even more.So he doesn’t “suck up” offensive rebounds from his teammates.Rather, he “makes his teammates rebound better”(related to “makes his teammates play better”), and to an amazing degree.From basketballvalue.com come the team offensive rebounding stats.The average team has an offensive rebounding rate of 29%.These numbers are fairly clustered, with all but the best and the worst ranging from 26% to 31%.The best (except for Portland) is Philly at 33.4%.
Portland without Oden, is 32.5%, which would be 2nd in league.But with him, we rise far above the pack.With Greg in the lineup, our offensive rebounding rate is 38.7%!If you are into statistics, with Greg in the lineup, Portland is 5 standard deviations better than the average.
For one individual player to make that much of a difference is truly amazing.It’s such an incredible margin, and indicates that he is a once in a generation offensive rebounder.

Quote

javier
Jun 30, 2009 13:20

I think is lacking in confidence , first you have to believe in yourself
or else nobody will;
Check Kevin Garnett is not all that , in fact in his rookie year 15.8 one of
the lowest per , in fact Ewing and Howard are a lot better in paper but
Ewing never won a ring and Howard we will have to wait and see, the
point is even if you don’t show great numbers you have to believe that
you can , I guess is a mind thing ( determination) as well.

Quote

Paul
Jul 1, 2009 10:13

While Oden might not be a bust in the sens that he might become productive, it can’t be too encouraging of a start to even be in that discussion. Especially while Durant is looking like a future MVP.

Quote

sumchick
Jul 1, 2009 23:59

Oden even admitted in an interview that Pryzbilla should be starting over him but because he was the poster child he got to start. The rumors around portland pre-finding out he was injured was “He is the future, we’re gonna be in the championship because of him his ROOKIE season.” WTF? The Marketing has tried to focus on him too much, which to me has made him into a bust. He’s not living up to their hype, so they need to focus elsewhere until he brings more to the table than an elevated fouling average and injury rate.

Quote

skeleman
Jul 13, 2009 19:07

me too

Fleezy: IfIwereNateMc.IwouldhitOdenwithswitcheverytimehefouled

Quote

Leave a Reply

Comment

Most Popular Content

Fantasy, NBA - Jun 9, 2009 1:10 - 31 Comments

Not So PERfect

More In Fantasy


NBA - Sep 4, 2009 11:24 - 0 Comments

The NBA…Where Fudging Happens

More In NBA


Olympics, Other - Aug 22, 2009 17:58 - 0 Comments

Usain Bolt – Fastest Man Ever

More In Other


 
close button for voting.

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up